Shall we stay in the EU?

This website is for promoting and developing a sound political ideology and so we recognise Brexit as a crisis and distraction for the EU and UK caused by the lack of governments having sound ideology. Poor and war torn nations would not be so if their peoples possessed sound political ideology – and in turn immigration levels to UK would not be a problem. If the U.K. and EU governments were in possession of sound political ideology there would not be problems with jobs, poverty, housing, education and health service quality and funding: leading to tribalism, nationalism, separatism and protectionism. So Brexit process is a waste of time and resources – rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic.

Rationalism and Rational Group

Two things are required to address the political, economic, environmental and social chaos we see around the world –

The first is a sound and comprehensive ideology: Rationalism provides the moral principles, social structures and economic methods necessary for mankind to flourish now and, because it allows the recommendations of environmental science to be embraced, in the future too.  Like the founder, most people will be unaware of any previous use of the word ‘Rationalism’ but for clarity the ideology is not drawn from other thinking.  We do not adjust policy to gain popular support, we are about education and openness, explaining and winning people around.  Unlike a political party we welcome new thinking.  You do not need to canvass for the Rational Group or donate or be a member to influence our policies and solutions.

The second is widespread understanding and global popular support for Rationalism.  By joining or supporting the Rational Group, spreading the word, canvassing, signing petitions, making donations, helping with web site and social media, the merging of charities and NGOs, and language translation you will be doing important work to make the world a better place.  Fortunately, public support for Rationalism can be widespread and informed, partly because the causes and solutions to world problems are actually quite straight forward, and also because the internet allows ideas to be disseminated freely in a way that was impossible 500, 100 or even 10 years ago.  We estimate that with some interest from TV and newspapers, celebrities and a budget as little as $600,000 we can provide annual benefits to mankind in the 100’s of trillions.

In the case of democracies, politicians are receptive to public opinion; in the case of authoritarian regimes, leaders still need viable ideology or could peacefully be displaced because of the ideology’s inclusive nature, so wherever you live it is well worth investing the small effort necessary to see change



What’s it all about

As things stand, does anyone think world leaders can solve world problems?  I trust not, and hope you are open to the idea that world leaders should take advice, but who from?   When the UK’s Labour Party lost the election in 2015 I wrote to them urging them to first look at new social, economic and environmental solutions: a new ideology for their party, but they went ahead and chose a new leader.  Some ‘moronic MPs’ nominated Jeremy Corbyn.  The other candidates, Kendall and Burnham, were what I describe as managerial politicians: ones that claim to be able to bring people together, reconcile and make the best decisions at the time depending on global economic conditions.  One could compare Hillary Clinton and Marco Rubio to these managerial politicians.  As we know now, people had had enough of these characters, and those ‘left behind by globalisation’ rose up, choosing Brexit, Corbyn and Trump.

So how do we get politicians to look at comprehensive new political plans so these political dead ends can be avoided?  It is not out of the question for them to develop the interest to look at (new) Rationalism – but we can better rely on change if millions join us, learn, contribute and promulgate.

Get in touch to find out about Rational Group solutions: email, telephone, attend or host a meeting.



Rationalism – a comprehensive ideology

Rationalism describes the social and business structures, and details the values and economic methods necessary for a prosperous, sustainable, and peaceful world.  It describes the systems required to optimally manage education, training, employment, housing, healthcare, taxation, world trade, capital and global resources.  The ideology offers a common base all responsible political parties can adopt, prerequisite for the coherence required for sustained progress around the world. The EU, for example, is in desperate need of pan-euro parties to allow it to progress to a federation, but it is not an idea ever talked about because constituent states social and economic policy is so dire.


Understanding the problems – poor economic management and inequity

We are not producing the right goods and services, nor in a sustainable way, and they are not being distributed optimally.  Rationalism provides answers to how the 3 objectives of economic efficiency, sustainability, and equity can be achieved.  To set mankind on the path to achieving these objectives, which one needs to come first and why?  Can you think of two things essential to achieving the objective?


Understanding the problems – economic theory

It’s good to identify and understand the problems before working on the solutions!

Companies rise and fall but there is no need for there to be an overall rise.  Economic contraction can be an indicator of greater efficiency.  The belief that economic growth is essential, the reliance on it as a cure-all, and the important things that are consequently ignored, are the most significant and damaging failures of contemporary economic theory.  Economic growth is not the primary thing we should be monitoring, only in the developing world, assuming regions should remain inhabited and not be a part of a wider economic and social union, need there be growth.   Economic output needs to be categorised, good or bad, building prosperity or damaging.  Wealth and economic output levels can and do go in opposite directions and therefore need to be understood as separable by economists and the electorate.  See if you can come up with five reasons preoccupation with economic growth is bad.

Soft landing over the Fiscal Cliff

Now it’s 2017 but it was back in November 2012 that the two things needed to avoid the so-called Fiscal Cliff being a problem were blogged here:

1.) Share out the jobs

2.) Cease trading at a deficit

Neither Republicans nor Democrats seem to have any idea of this solution, it’s detail or value.  Only small measures were taken to reduce the government deficit and so there has been no fall from a cliff (well! USA government shutdown with nearly 1M workers not paid 1 Oct – 16 Oct 2013).  Debt continues to grow, USA government still spends more than it gets in.  Total USA government debt is about $15,000,000,000,000.  But that’s not all Americans owe, private debt on top is estimated at $40,000,000,000,000!  Supposedly only $5,000,000,000,00 owed to China.  Chinese now enjoy spending the most as international tourists – of course these are not the low paid Chinese workers. What about the cliff?  Will the debt make it crumble, and the dollar plummet?  Who do the rich and powerful of China care more about, their American customers or their poor Chinese workers? Will creditors be allowed to lose out or will future generations of USA citizens be held to account? If the latter will China use the money to pays its workers more?  There is another solution to the wage disparity, can you work out what it is?

Part of the solution that will end the economic mess and provide long term stability is to share out jobs.  Doing this provides greater scope for change and therefore options to achieve an averaged out trading balance (imports equal to exports) and fiscal neutrality (government spending within what it collects in tax) or as close to it as is necessary to avoid economic ill effects including inflation and very low interest rates.  Currently  governments try to create jobs, ineffectively, and do not know how to equalise pay.   The Trump administration, for example, has woolly ideas to repatriate jobs, and is pursuing the flawed idea of economic growth to create more work fuelled by abandoning climate change concerns, oh dear.

If you can help get our solutions looked at, perhaps have contact with a genuine philanthropist, responsible senator, congressman, newspaper or tv station, email: